Online Watchers: 30
Categories
Get the latest Flash Player to see this video.
* HD format might not be available
Play in:   Low Quality | | *


Post a comment

Guest Name:
Comment:

Local Comments (0)

Youtube Comments (131534)

TheMaxColonel Says:

May 18, 2013 - Ugly terrorist loving sheep.

RP4409 Says:

May 18, 2013 - Who thinks is was an inside job?

Mark H Says:

May 18, 2013 - "I wonder what could be?" - There was plenty of footage taken of the towers...... from many people.... different angles.... Perhaps you could show me the video with loud demo explosions clearly going off? Go ahead.

Mark H Says:

May 18, 2013 - " their paper was NOT concerned with the cause of collapse," - Irrelevant. The point here is about the dust. They claim its a result of the fire and collapses.

Mark H Says:

May 18, 2013 - "were formed by very high temperatures DURING the destruction of the WTC." - Not all of the spheres. They don't say this either. Their comments was that the characteristics of the dust was a result of the fire and collapses. "Beyond that, not much can be taken from their research" - They directly contradict the conspiracy theorists. You're picking and choosing when to accept what they say.

Adelita Phoenix Says:

May 18, 2013 - The freedom of the internet, and social outlets such as this one have allowed people to wake up and realize that not everything is as we are told it is. As time passes on, the amount of people who get their information from Newspapers and Television will dwindle to a minority... and for the truth seekers out there, this is a beautiful thing.

Sockpuppet2012 Says:

May 17, 2013 - To learn what happened on 911, visit: AE911Truth Youtube channel Also watch the YouTube video: 911 Missing Links Please help spread the Truth And the Truth will set the World free!

zenoist2 Says:

May 17, 2013 - So tell me again how the proven free fall and simultaneous global unified collapse is diue to " fire damage" when nist in the official report couldnt link them together or explain it? No doubt you clever debunkers have spotted something NIST have missed?Until then the free fall from "fire damage " only remains a total mystery much like the effects of Hiroshima if you instantly rule out an atomic bomb despite overwhelming evidence it was used. Must have been fire damage eh?

zenoist2 Says:

May 17, 2013 - HAHA so the official story for the free fall is fire damage? Bear in mind its TOTALLY AND SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Nice one nist. PS when are you going to release your 68,000 witheld documents for public viewing? If you are telling the truth there should be no problem at all with this.

zenoist2 Says:

May 17, 2013 - Boom! BOOM ! BOOM! what are those explosions weve been hearing all day ? oh look its falling at free fall when theres hardly any fires. I wonder what could be? Maybe explosions are caused by explosives? Maybe since free fall is UTTERLY IMPOSSIBLE from fire damage explosives were used? To not even investigate the possibility of explosives should land the entire NIST team responsible in court for criminal negligence at the very least.

smitty121981 Says:

May 17, 2013 - I agree with RJ Lee that the tiny molten spheres of iron(or steel) found in copious amount throughout the dust, were formed by very high temperatures DURING the destruction of the WTC. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? (yes/no) Beyond that, not much can be taken from their research because their paper was NOT concerned with the cause of collapse, but rather with the more mundane task of identifying wtc dust vs. background dust and determining the environmental impact of wtc dust.

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "I just pop in now and then to make a comment and flag every single debunker comment as spam for the simple reason it is." - wow you must have such a great life! ... that you visit a channel just to mark people for spam and then leave.... It must all be working out for you lol...... I wish I was as cool as you...

zenoist2 Says:

May 17, 2013 - Flagged for spam. Unlike you dickhead debunkers I have other things to do with my life rather than sitting on youtube 911 videos all day and posting unbelievably stupid comments. I just pop in now and then to make a comment and flag every single debunker comment as spam for the simple reason it is.

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "Your lack of direct response c" - I have responded to every single one of your posts moron. Learn to use the internet retard. " RJ Lee Report " - Oh you mean the people who claimed that the fire and collapses were what caused what was found in the dust? ... ... this is where idiots like yourself decide to start ignoring the same people you reference as experts...

smitty121981 Says:

May 17, 2013 - Your lack of direct response can only be interpreted as your endorsement of my critique of your biased use of firefighter quotes. Thank you "You are the people trying to claim that fire fighters can perform metalurgical analysis on a molten by looking at it and can't be wrong." NO, I've never claimed anything like that. I prefer to use published papers to demonstrate that iron/steel was melted, such as the RJ Lee Report which states that ~6% of the WTC dust is tiny molten droplets of iron/steel!

Sockpuppet2012 Says:

May 17, 2013 - To learn what happened on 911, visit: AE911Truth Youtube channel Also watch the YouTube video: 911 Missing Links Please help spread the Truth And the Truth will set the World free!

Mad Max Says:

May 17, 2013 - "I'm saying you're using the wrong term and I am using the right one" "that's all you debunking cunts do, twist and play with words. If a truther makes a good point just attack his line of questioning or point out a spelling mistake or anything to avoid the question all together or just simply pretend it never happened like the 9/11 commission report and WTC 7" SPEED IS NOT ACCELERATION HOW THE FUCK CAN YOU SAY YOU'RE USING THE RIGHT ONE WHEN IT'S NOT APPLICABLE PERIOD TO ANYTHING I WAS SAYING!

Mike2020able Says:

May 17, 2013 - Watch . 911 Attack was conducted by ISRAEL  > on YouTube .

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "weaken the steel and initiate global progressive collapse"NCSTAR 1-3 does NOT even support the LATTER HYPOTHESIS " - Considering nearly all of those samples weren't from the impact floors they don't support anything..... "WHY NO high temp WTC " - It's gone retard.... you didn't know that?

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "What I find funny and amusing is that YOU CAN NOT use the 10,000+ page report to support ANYTHING!!!" - You mean like this? Column bowing WTC 1 - NCSTAR1-3C Figure 2-24 and 2-25 NCSTAR 1-5A Figure 8-108. WTC 2 - NCSTAR1-3C Figure 2-37 and NCSTAR1-5A Figures 9-46, 9-59, 9-80, 9-82, and 9-83. Demonstrates that the fires were weakening the steel.....

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "tell us about FIRE that REMOVED 105'! - 105? What? Ohh you want to know how the free fall could have happened? The interior of the building collapses ..leaving the remaining columns to bear the load... they cannot and a collapse starts.. the collapse continues bringing the whole building down ... during this total collapse those remaining columns fail and buckle under the moving load and there is a moment of no support....

Mark H Says:

May 17, 2013 - "lol...it's called SCIENCE MArLIE!!!" - Saying stupid things is called science? You seem to have yourself confused.

Mike2020able Says:

May 17, 2013 - WATCH . ISRAEL DID 911 > on  YouTube .

Mike2020able Says:

May 17, 2013 - America Awakening . Watch > Why the Military Knows Israel did 911  , on YouTube

hgfbob Says:

May 17, 2013 - "will use NIST information to prove" What I find funny and amusing is that YOU CAN NOT use the 10,000+ page report to support ANYTHING!!! why is that? "None of the samples tested indicated exposure to the range of temperatures sufficient to weaken the steel and initiate global progressive collapse"NCSTAR 1-3 does NOT even support the LATTER HYPOTHESIS crew who state the FIRES PRESENT failed the WTC steel to ALLOW collapse of all three buildings. WHY NO high temp WTC steel REPRESENTATION?

View My Stats