First Demonstrations of Intel's 22nm 3-D Tri-Gate...

Regimantas Baublys Says:

Apr 12, 2013 - Works just with ms, and mac, gnu/linux not supported :( unusable expensive processors

erron eous Says:

Feb 21, 2013 - 22nm has to do with the gate size of each transistor on the chip.

ICEGTN Says:

Dec 2, 2012 - Didn't anyone teach you math? 32 is to 12, as 22 is to 8.25

eurohim Says:

Oct 23, 2012 - You could switch those out with Atom processors and we'd never know. How many MIPS?

rakeshkumar47 Says:

Apr 15, 2012 - maybe he's using VLC 2.0 too....i guess

HunterXray Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - Let's say you bring home a pizza from the store and measure it with a tape measure. It's 10 inches. So you have a 10 inch pizza. Later on, you bring another pizza home from the store and measure that one also. It measures 12 inches, so you have a 12 inch pizza. Well, 32nm is to the 12 inch pizza, as 22nm is to the 10 inch pizza. Get it?

HunterXray Says:

Apr 10, 2012 - Windows 7 ratings only go to 7.9, unless you where being funny with the 8.5.

CyberSzabo Says:

Apr 8, 2012 - The graphics on the game are terrible.

sniped101 Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - it should be about 300. When I got the q6600, it was 300. AMD is slipping behind. If the ivy bridge is twice as fast as my q6600.. Ill take it for 300 anyday.

sniped101 Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - it should be about 300. When I got the q6600, it was 300. AMD is slipping behind. If the ivy bridge is twice as fast as my q6600.. Ill take it for 300 anyday.

sniped101 Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - well.. I have a q6600 in my desktop 65nm go stepping at 3.2ghz and i get 7.3 on w7 ratings... my friend has a laptop with qm2670 i7 32nm processor and he is getting 7.5. My guess is that a i7 in a desktop gets about 8 and the ones that are coming out are at least 8.5

sniped101 Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - perhaps thats why they surpassed AMD...

sniped101 Says:

Apr 3, 2012 - damn guys.. My q6600 is 65nm.. lol. I guess if the price is right on these, ill upgrade =DDDD. and why didn't he show something useful.... 

kickitup2006xc1 Says:

Mar 31, 2012 - Umm. Because the previous generation sandybridge was 32nm.... ... ... ... .... and ivy bridge are 22nm.... What do you not get?? and no.. it hasn't always been. Processers have been shrinking for the past 40 years. I suggest you move out from under your rather large ROCK HOUSE and join the rest of us in 2012.... ROFLMAO

LaenPvP Says:

Mar 27, 2012 - Let's see some atomic computers that count individual atoms for computations! Yeah!

Chenle Wang Says:

Mar 21, 2012 - Guys who are not working on semiconductor or IC may not understand how wonderful this is... Well, if that is real.

atom608 Says:

Mar 14, 2012 - that game on the server was on vlc media player lol

MisterSensational Says:

Mar 13, 2012 - I wish they were a little more honest about the racing game actually not working...

rajath hegde Says:

Mar 10, 2012 - can anyone explain why the number 22 is chosen.earlier it was 32...its always been an even no?

rubikfan1 Says:

Feb 28, 2012 - i searched over the internet and i found out that the record for the smallest working cpu is 3nm, the problem was: it was a single nanochip(1 chip of 3nm). but i though intel had a full 14nm computer in there lab working richt now

Jadin Andrews Says:

Feb 21, 2012 - Intel takes Moore's Law quite seriously it seems..

Jadin Andrews Says:

Feb 21, 2012 - i agree. nice to know things are still getting smaller and faster!

jimmyyu1112 Says:

Feb 18, 2012 - Why do they always treat everyone as retards, play a video, and pretend they are playing a 3D game in real time?

Alan Bacon Says:

Dec 30, 2011 - I think you missed the point. The point was to show they have working examples of 22nm chips. That's twice as fast as the 32nm chips that are out, like the second gen i3s,i5s and i7s. They don't have to show it doing something amazing, they just have to show that it works! =)