Jun 10, 2012 - Final of Roland Garros is in progress, Rafa Nadal and Novak Djokovic will
soon decide who will be the king of French Open 2012. Who do you think will
win the tournament? The world ranking leader Djokovic or the
clay-specialist Nadal? Follow the results live at and enjoy highlights of
their last mutual final: Monte Carlo 2012. Follow today's most exciting
tennis match at http://www.livescore.in/match/Sp71LeM9/ !
Monte Carlo 2012 - Final - Nadal vs Djokovic highlights (HQ-480p)
Apr 24, 2012 - @AMMELATU Hi best was actually the 2010 US Open. if he played like he did
in that tourny all the time he would have 14 slams right now
May 9, 2012 - nadal on clay. hmm. well,to all nadal fans. rafa on clay is not winning his
matches I should say-on tennis way. what I wanna say? SKILLS, people,
skills!!! compared to fed and djokovic, he is reduced in that apartment.
he's winning with his natural power. these days game is so phissically
demanding,and he has a benefit of it. I don't want to be misunderstudded.
personally,i like technic more, because when i see that endless rallyes on
clay against rafa,with players getting tired,it's just boring
May 5, 2012 - If you have anything between those two ears you have, you would know that
Clay is the least rewarding surface. It doesn't reward skills like a big
serve, fast ground strokes, not even volleys, which sit up and you get
passed. In short, all you have to do is stand on the baseline like a puzzy
and hit all day long. If that's how you measure greatness, then good for
you man, enjoy tennis and your favorite player.
Alexandra Zeres Says:
May 2, 2012 - I can't believe a sport so great as tennis has such immature fans as most
of the people who commented on this video. Shame on you for trying to put
down ANY of the world players. Discuss the game and techniques, not the
players. Calling them names will not make you a more special person.
Anyways, I am sorry for Djoko's loss of his grandfather, but let's not take
away all Nadal's credit for wining the match. Cheers!
May 23, 2012 - Why the fuck do people talk about federer so much on this video. He's not
even playing so shut up
Jun 8, 2012 - 2:00 So. Much. Topspin.
May 23, 2012 - @SteveAugeriRocks yeah i think it wouldn't of mattered if federer was 2 or
3 he'll be facing nadal or novak,2nd set of the AO roger should've taken it
up a early break ,3rd set he was down 6-1 in tiebreak? then got to 6-5 1
more point in that breaker tofederer could've changed the outcome but thats
alsen demiri Says:
Jul 4, 2012 - nole nije bio spremnn imao je srece nadalla
Vitor Hara Says:
Jul 28, 2012 - clay is the surface he is good on anyways cuz he uses his amazing athletic
ability to win and piss off his opponents
Jul 23, 2012 - Nadal skillful as them? I doubt so. He uses physical only. When he loses he
know why he lost, its due to lack of physical, lack chasing after returns.
Next time he know he can win if his condition is good. But this condition
is sickness too, only maximum for a month or 2. And we never know if he
uses substances. Because djokovic could be using substances in 2011 to
matthew neely Says:
May 18, 2012 - what are you on about Rafa beats federer every time but on the occasional
best of 3 setter fed takes! and if its indoors but the novak-nadal matches
are way closer...federer hasnt a chance of taking a nadal on any day to a 5
set 6 hour match GET with it you fed suck-arse
May 6, 2012 - The is a reason Laver personally calls Roger the greatest ever, even better
than himself. Anyways, South Americans are retarded. Pump up in the gym,
stay on the baseline and hit all day long LOL So are those Spaniards. And
that is precisely what Nadal is. If it weren't for Clay and how slow
Wimbledon and Australian have become, there would be no Nadal. Don't even
get me started on how unsporting Nadal is. Typical Hispanic thug (I have
personal experience from soccer).
May 24, 2012 - yes, that' sorrect, but generally..more peopke will tell that Fed is more
talented than Nadal, soo...that's just what I wanna say
May 8, 2012 - I am not disagreeing with you. Yes, if it were not for hard courts I may
not have been a tennis and Fed fan. The argument I'm trying to make is that
hard courts represent what is neutral between clay and grass. Clay is way,
way too extreme on one side, that is all I'm trying to say. And Nadal is
very very good on that surface. Hard courts give all kinds of skill an
equal chance, it also rewards endurance if you're willing to dig in. Even
the Wimby grass is behaving like clay these days.
Lodhi Saab Says:
May 5, 2012 - b) You claim Federer is an all-court player yet, 80% of Roger's titles are
on hard courts. One reason is that the grass court season is short. But
hey, Nadal can play on grass as well. 5 Wimbledon finals, 1 Queens .. how
can one claim that if the grass court season were longer, Nadal wouldn't
win more titles on it ? So if you want to claim Nadal is a clay-courter,
then break down Federer's titles as per court surface and you'll realize
he's predominantly won on hard courts.
dragan stupar Says:
May 10, 2012 - Fedex always lose against djokovic and nadal. So shut up! Fedex is scum,
like the most of west europians!
Sep 11, 2012 - nadal is my spanish nigga !
Dark Voice Says:
Apr 26, 2012 - Well 7 times. Because if he lost 8th time he wouldn't be able to win 8
times in a row.
Apr 29, 2012 - I agree
andreas furrer Says:
Apr 27, 2012 - retarder would be your mother
stefan kuzmanovic Says:
Aug 16, 2012 - hahaah djokovic je propao nista jos niej sovojio ko nadal pa da ih
Apr 26, 2012 - I think he has not 2000 from FO. He reached only SF so it will be less.
Sun Seeker Says:
Sep 5, 2012 - Nadull with more boring tennis
Dec 6, 2012 - Poor copy of Rafapedia...
Rock Ballads PlayList